From: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
To: Yehyeong Lee <yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/scsifront: check for a NULL shadow entry on a backend response
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2026 15:56:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f073f438-7335-4d9f-9bba-c6df5ee1fa40@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261005123555.253995-1-yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1246 bytes --]
On 05.10.26 14:35, Yehyeong Lee wrote:
> scsifront_do_response() validates the rqid in a backend response against
> VSCSIIF_MAX_REQS before using it to index info->shadow[], but then
> dereferences the entry to test ->inflight without checking that the slot
> is populated. Shadow slots are NULL before a command is submitted (the
> host private area is zeroed at allocation) and are reset to NULL in
> _scsifront_put_rqid() once a request completes, so an in-range rqid that
> does not correspond to an outstanding request makes the frontend
> dereference a NULL pointer.
>
> A malicious or buggy backend can thus crash the guest by returning a
> response whose rqid is in range but not in flight -- for example a
> spurious response before any command has been issued, or a duplicate of
> one already completed. The ring has only VSCSIIF_MAX_REQS (16) slots, so
> before the first command every in-range rqid selects a NULL slot.
>
> Reject a response whose shadow slot is not populated.
>
> Fixes: 6d1c2f48f3fc ("xen/scsifront: harden driver against malicious backend")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Yehyeong Lee <yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr>
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Juergen
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3743 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-05 12:35 Yehyeong Lee
2026-10-06 13:56 ` Jürgen Groß [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f073f438-7335-4d9f-9bba-c6df5ee1fa40@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=yhlee@isslab.korea.ac.kr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®