From: Sunho Park <shpark061104@gmail.com>
To: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: paulmck@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+d4faf7db59e11f6fd1ab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] srcu: false-positive WARN in cleanup_srcu_struct() after 78a38cbf6f20
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 18:11:45 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f85c60a0-81d7-41a4-9926-f69cf10222d0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb2132ad05cd3804a8f2a170de441d79afa793e9@linux.dev>
On 8/27/26 08:53, Zqiang wrote:
> Based on your description below, the 5.srcu_barrier() did not intercept the callback of 4.call_srcu(),
> this means that 4.call_srcu() and 5.srcu_barrier() concurrent calls, or calls after 5.srcu_barrier().
>
> The combination of srcu_barrier() and cleanup_srcu_struct() typically occurs on the module exit path.
> srcu_barrier() ensures that all previously inserted callbacks complete,so therefore, theoretically,
> there shouldn't be any callbacks left to execute after we finish executing srcu_barrier().
> and of course, there are also shouldn't be any ongoing or newly started SRCU grace period and the
> WARN_ON() in cleanup_srcu_struct() is designed to detect it.
>
> If when the cleanup_srcu_struct() detects an incomplete SRCU grace period or any srcu callbacks
> that have not yet been executed, this is a risk that needs to be reported, even if the
> cleanup_srcu_struct() can intercept it internally.
>
> Therefore, we should investigate this issue to ensure that 5.srcu_barrier() can intercept the step 4 callback.
>
> Thanks
> Zqiang
Before 5. srcu_barrier() call, the 4. call_srcu() is finished and the
callback was enqueued, and srcu_barrier() did intercept it by appending
barrier cb after it. They can't be called concurrently because when
call_srcu() is called inside kvm_io_bus_register_dev(), the kvm
reference count is nonzero and kvm_destroy_vm() which calls
srcu_barrier() could not be started.
In my debugging, all five __free_bus() callbacks enqueued by
kvm_io_bus_register_dev() were invoked before the barrier cb, and only
then the barrier cb is called and srcu_barrier() returns. So all the
real callbacks were executed and practically there were no callbacks
left to execute when srcu_barrier() returns, but a stale n_cbs > 0 is
left because srcu_invoke_callbacks()'s invoking loop has not finished.
KVM logic correctly called srcu_barrier() and cleanup_srcu_struct()
without calling call_srcu() in between. In my opinion, the root causes
are as follows:
1) for timer_delete_sync(): the srcu_gp_end() which ended the last grace
period (from 4. ) arms sdp->delay_work to expire at jiffies + 1 even
though the invoke work (queued in 3. ) is already queued, and
cleanup_srcu_struct() runs before that one-jiffy timer expires, so
timer_delete_sync() cancels that pending timer and returns true.
2) for n_cbs: srcu_invoke_callbacks() calls rcu_segcblist_add_len(-len)
only at the end of the work item, after the barrier callback has been
invoked and srcu_barrier() has already returned, so
cleanup_srcu_struct() observes a stale n_cbs > 0 while the cblist is
physically empty.
Thanks
Sunho Park
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 10:56 Sunho Park
2026-08-25 12:33 ` Zqiang
2026-08-25 16:50 ` Sunho Park
2026-08-26 13:13 ` Zqiang
2026-08-26 16:03 ` Sunho Park
2026-08-26 23:53 ` Zqiang
2026-08-27 9:11 ` Sunho Park [this message]
2026-08-27 11:13 ` Zqiang
2026-08-27 11:35 ` Zqiang
2026-08-27 12:30 ` Sunho Park
2026-08-27 12:40 ` Zqiang
2026-08-27 13:03 ` Sunho Park
2026-08-27 13:40 ` Zqiang
2026-08-27 13:41 ` Zqiang
2026-08-29 23:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f85c60a0-81d7-41a4-9926-f69cf10222d0@gmail.com \
--to=shpark061104@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+d4faf7db59e11f6fd1ab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®