mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sunho Park <shpark061104@gmail.com>
To: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: paulmck@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+d4faf7db59e11f6fd1ab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] srcu: false-positive WARN in cleanup_srcu_struct() after 78a38cbf6f20
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 18:11:45 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f85c60a0-81d7-41a4-9926-f69cf10222d0@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb2132ad05cd3804a8f2a170de441d79afa793e9@linux.dev>

On 8/27/26 08:53, Zqiang wrote:
> Based on your description below, the 5.srcu_barrier() did not intercept the callback of 4.call_srcu(),
> this means that 4.call_srcu() and 5.srcu_barrier() concurrent calls, or calls after 5.srcu_barrier().
> 
> The combination of srcu_barrier() and cleanup_srcu_struct() typically occurs on the module exit path.
> srcu_barrier() ensures that all previously inserted callbacks complete,so therefore, theoretically,
> there shouldn't be any callbacks left to execute after we finish executing srcu_barrier().
> and of course, there are also shouldn't be any ongoing or newly started SRCU grace period and the
> WARN_ON() in cleanup_srcu_struct() is designed to detect it.
> 
> If when the cleanup_srcu_struct() detects an incomplete SRCU grace period or any srcu callbacks
> that have not yet been executed, this is a risk that needs to be reported, even if the
> cleanup_srcu_struct() can intercept it internally.
>   
> Therefore, we should investigate this issue to ensure that 5.srcu_barrier() can intercept the step 4 callback.
> 
> Thanks
> Zqiang

Before 5. srcu_barrier() call, the 4. call_srcu() is finished and the 
callback was enqueued, and srcu_barrier() did intercept it by appending 
barrier cb after it. They can't be called concurrently because when 
call_srcu() is called inside kvm_io_bus_register_dev(), the kvm 
reference count is nonzero and kvm_destroy_vm() which calls 
srcu_barrier() could not be started.

In my debugging, all five __free_bus() callbacks enqueued by 
kvm_io_bus_register_dev() were invoked before the barrier cb, and only 
then the barrier cb is called and srcu_barrier() returns. So all the 
real callbacks were executed and practically there were no callbacks 
left to execute when srcu_barrier() returns, but a stale n_cbs > 0 is 
left because srcu_invoke_callbacks()'s invoking loop has not finished.

KVM logic correctly called srcu_barrier() and cleanup_srcu_struct() 
without calling call_srcu() in between. In my opinion, the root causes 
are as follows:

1) for timer_delete_sync(): the srcu_gp_end() which ended the last grace 
period (from 4. ) arms sdp->delay_work to expire at jiffies + 1 even 
though the invoke work (queued in 3. ) is already queued, and 
cleanup_srcu_struct() runs before that one-jiffy timer expires, so 
timer_delete_sync() cancels that pending timer and returns true.

2) for n_cbs: srcu_invoke_callbacks() calls rcu_segcblist_add_len(-len) 
only at the end of the work item, after the barrier callback has been 
invoked and srcu_barrier() has already returned, so 
cleanup_srcu_struct() observes a stale n_cbs > 0 while the cblist is 
physically empty.

Thanks
Sunho Park

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-27  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-24 10:56 Sunho Park
2026-08-25 12:33 ` Zqiang
2026-08-25 16:50   ` Sunho Park
2026-08-26 13:13     ` Zqiang
2026-08-26 16:03       ` Sunho Park
2026-08-26 23:53         ` Zqiang
2026-08-27  9:11           ` Sunho Park [this message]
2026-08-27 11:13             ` Zqiang
2026-08-27 11:35               ` Zqiang
2026-08-27 12:30                 ` Sunho Park
2026-08-27 12:40                 ` Zqiang
2026-08-27 13:03                   ` Sunho Park
2026-08-27 13:40                     ` Zqiang
2026-08-27 13:41                     ` Zqiang
2026-08-29 23:08                       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f85c60a0-81d7-41a4-9926-f69cf10222d0@gmail.com \
    --to=shpark061104@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+d4faf7db59e11f6fd1ab@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®