From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm/gup: honour FOLL_PIN in NOMMU __get_user_pages_locked()
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 12:09:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f988c1ee-987b-4ca5-a679-bac42f9c91bc@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921-nommu_gup_pin-v4-1-c410041cc479@kernel.org>
On 9/21/26 11:57, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>
> The !CONFIG_MMU implementation of __get_user_pages_locked() takes a bare
> get_page() reference for each page regardless of foll_flags:
> if (pages[i])
> get_page(pages[i]);
>
> This is reached from pin_user_pages*() with FOLL_PIN set.
> unpin_user_page() is shared between MMU and NOMMU configurations and
> unconditionally calls gup_put_folio(..., FOLL_PIN), which subtracts
> GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS (1024) from the folio refcount.
>
> This means that pin adds 1, and then unpin will subtract 1024.
>
> If a user maps a page (refcount 1), registers it 1023 times as an
> io_uring fixed buffer (1023 pin_user_pages calls -> refcount 1024), then
> unregisters: the first unpin_user_page subtracts 1024, refcount hits 0,
> the page is freed and returned to the buddy allocator. The remaining
> 1022 unpins write into whatever was reallocated, and the user's VMA
> still maps the freed page (NOMMU has no MMU to invalidate it).
> Reallocating the page for an io_uring pbuf_ring then lets userspace
> corrupt the new owner's data through the stale mapping.
>
> Use try_grab_folio() which adds GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS for FOLL_PIN and 1
> for FOLL_GET, mirroring the CONFIG_MMU path so pin and unpin are
> symmetric. Keep supporting the traditional behavior where users specify
> a pages array but don't set FOLL_GET.
>
> While at it, don't return NULL pointers in the page array,
> as this is really not expected for GUP users; instead, just fail and return
> -EFAULT.
>
> [ david: support traditional behavior with no FOLL_GET, extend
> description ]
>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Cc: Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>
> Reported-by: Anthropic
> Fixes: 3faa52c03f44 ("mm/gup: track FOLL_PIN pages")
> Assisted-by: gkh_clanker_t1000
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
> ---
> v3 -> v4:
> * Put FOLL_GET fixup into the NOMMU __get_user_pages_locked()
>
> I'll queue the updated version after some more review.
> ---
> mm/gup.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index eb898ea1ee22e..4e9b5ac2cb62e 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -1983,6 +1983,7 @@ static long __get_user_pages_locked(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> bool must_unlock = false;
> vm_flags_t vm_flags;
> + int ret, err = -EFAULT;
> long i;
>
> if (!nr_pages)
> @@ -1999,6 +2000,10 @@ static long __get_user_pages_locked(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
> *locked = 1;
> }
>
> + /* See the MMU variant: support the traditional behavior. */
> + if (pages && !(foll_flags & FOLL_PIN))
> + foll_flags |= FOLL_GET;
> +
> /* calculate required read or write permissions.
> * If FOLL_FORCE is set, we only require the "MAY" flags.
> */
> @@ -2019,8 +2024,14 @@ static long __get_user_pages_locked(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
>
> if (pages) {
> pages[i] = virt_to_page((void *)start);
> - if (pages[i])
> - get_page(pages[i]);
> + if (!pages[i])
> + break;
> + ret = try_grab_folio(page_folio(pages[i]), 1, foll_flags);
BTW Sashiko reports:
"Does this code leak the folio if it is a slab page?" ... "When the operation
completes, the caller releases the page via put_page(). However, put_page()
explicitly checks folio_test_slab() and returns without
decrementing the refcount."
get_page() contains
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_slab(folio)))
for a good reason. It's not supposed to happen. So if we would get slab pages
here we'd be in "preexisting problem" territory.
As slab pages have a frozen refcount, we'd similarly trigger
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_ref_count(folio) <= 0))
Now in try_grab_folio and refuse the operation.
So I'll ignore this one.
--
Cheers,
David
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 9:57 David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-09-21 12:46 ` Lance Yang
2026-09-22 9:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2026-09-22 10:09 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f988c1ee-987b-4ca5-a679-bac42f9c91bc@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®