mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: stephane eranian <eranian@googlemail.com>
To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Gary.Mohr@Bull.com" <Gary.Mohr@bull.com>,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf_events: support for uncore a.k.a. nest units
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 10:44:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <i2j7c86c4471004210144kd8223bfbve5d6bee2820d0ccf@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271839190.3794.5.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com>

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 16:32 +0800, stephane eranian wrote:
>> Seems to me that struct pmu is a shared resource across all CPUs.
>> I don't understand why scheduling on one CPU would have to impact
>> all the other CPUs, unless I am missing something here.
>
> Do you mean the pmu->flag?

Yes.

> You are right, pmu->flag should be per cpu data.
>
> Will update the patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Lin Ming
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 20:03 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 2010-04-20 at 19:55 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > > One thing not on that list, which should happen first I guess, is to
>> >> > > remove hw_perf_group_sched_in(). The idea is to add some sort of
>> >> > > transactional API to the struct pmu, so that we can delay the
>> >> > > schedulability check until commit time (and roll back when it fails).
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Something as simple as:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >   struct pmu {
>> >> > >     void start_txn(struct pmu *);
>> >> > >     void commit_txn(struct pmu *);
>> >> > >
>> >> > >     ,,,
>> >> > >   };
>> >> >
>> >> > Could you please explain a bit more?
>> >> >
>> >> > Does it mean that "start_txn" perform the schedule events stuff
>> >> > and "commit_txn" perform the assign events stuff?
>> >> >
>> >> > Does "commit time" mean the actual activation in hw_perf_enable?
>> >>
>> >> No, the idea behind hw_perf_group_sched_in() is to not perform
>> >> schedulability tests on each event in the group, but to add the group as
>> >> a whole and then perform one test.
>> >>
>> >> Of course, when that test fails, you'll have to roll-back the whole
>> >> group again.
>> >>
>> >> So start_txn (or a better name) would simply toggle a flag in the pmu
>> >> implementation that will make pmu::enable() not perform the
>> >> schedulablilty test.
>> >>
>> >> Then commit_txn() will perform the schedulability test (so note the
>> >> method has to have a !void return value, my mistake in the earlier
>> >> email).
>> >>
>> >> This will allow us to use the regular
>> >> kernel/perf_event.c::group_sched_in() and all the rollback code.
>> >> Currently each hw_perf_group_sched_in() implementation duplicates all
>> >> the rolllback code (with various bugs).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> We must get rid of all weak hw_perf_*() functions before we can properly
>> >> consider multiple struct pmu implementations.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Thanks for the clear explanation.
>> >
>> > Does below patch show what you mean?
>> >
>> > I only touch the x86 arch code now.
>> >
>> > ---
>> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c |  161 +++++++++++--------------------------
>> >  include/linux/perf_event.h       |   10 ++-
>> >  kernel/perf_event.c              |   28 +++----
>> >  3 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 132 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
>> > index 626154a..62aa9a1 100644
>> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
>> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
>> > @@ -944,6 +944,9 @@ static int x86_pmu_enable(struct perf_event *event)
>> >        if (n < 0)
>> >                return n;
>> >
>> > +       if (!(event->pmu->flag & PERF_EVENT_TRAN_STARTED))
>> > +               goto out;
>> > +
>> >        ret = x86_pmu.schedule_events(cpuc, n, assign);
>> >        if (ret)
>> >                return ret;
>> > @@ -953,6 +956,7 @@ static int x86_pmu_enable(struct perf_event *event)
>> >         */
>> >        memcpy(cpuc->assign, assign, n*sizeof(int));
>> >
>> > +out:
>> >        cpuc->n_events = n;
>> >        cpuc->n_added += n - n0;
>> >
>> > @@ -1210,119 +1214,6 @@ x86_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
>> >        return &unconstrained;
>> >  }
>> >
>> > -static int x86_event_sched_in(struct perf_event *event,
>> > -                         struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
>> > -{
>> > -       int ret = 0;
>> > -
>> > -       event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE;
>> > -       event->oncpu = smp_processor_id();
>> > -       event->tstamp_running += event->ctx->time - event->tstamp_stopped;
>> > -
>> > -       if (!is_x86_event(event))
>> > -               ret = event->pmu->enable(event);
>> > -
>> > -       if (!ret && !is_software_event(event))
>> > -               cpuctx->active_oncpu++;
>> > -
>> > -       if (!ret && event->attr.exclusive)
>> > -               cpuctx->exclusive = 1;
>> > -
>> > -       return ret;
>> > -}
>> > -
>> > -static void x86_event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event,
>> > -                           struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
>> > -{
>> > -       event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE;
>> > -       event->oncpu = -1;
>> > -
>> > -       if (!is_x86_event(event))
>> > -               event->pmu->disable(event);
>> > -
>> > -       event->tstamp_running -= event->ctx->time - event->tstamp_stopped;
>> > -
>> > -       if (!is_software_event(event))
>> > -               cpuctx->active_oncpu--;
>> > -
>> > -       if (event->attr.exclusive || !cpuctx->active_oncpu)
>> > -               cpuctx->exclusive = 0;
>> > -}
>> > -
>> > -/*
>> > - * Called to enable a whole group of events.
>> > - * Returns 1 if the group was enabled, or -EAGAIN if it could not be.
>> > - * Assumes the caller has disabled interrupts and has
>> > - * frozen the PMU with hw_perf_save_disable.
>> > - *
>> > - * called with PMU disabled. If successful and return value 1,
>> > - * then guaranteed to call perf_enable() and hw_perf_enable()
>> > - */
>> > -int hw_perf_group_sched_in(struct perf_event *leader,
>> > -              struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> > -              struct perf_event_context *ctx)
>> > -{
>> > -       struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
>> > -       struct perf_event *sub;
>> > -       int assign[X86_PMC_IDX_MAX];
>> > -       int n0, n1, ret;
>> > -
>> > -       if (!x86_pmu_initialized())
>> > -               return 0;
>> > -
>> > -       /* n0 = total number of events */
>> > -       n0 = collect_events(cpuc, leader, true);
>> > -       if (n0 < 0)
>> > -               return n0;
>> > -
>> > -       ret = x86_pmu.schedule_events(cpuc, n0, assign);
>> > -       if (ret)
>> > -               return ret;
>> > -
>> > -       ret = x86_event_sched_in(leader, cpuctx);
>> > -       if (ret)
>> > -               return ret;
>> > -
>> > -       n1 = 1;
>> > -       list_for_each_entry(sub, &leader->sibling_list, group_entry) {
>> > -               if (sub->state > PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF) {
>> > -                       ret = x86_event_sched_in(sub, cpuctx);
>> > -                       if (ret)
>> > -                               goto undo;
>> > -                       ++n1;
>> > -               }
>> > -       }
>> > -       /*
>> > -        * copy new assignment, now we know it is possible
>> > -        * will be used by hw_perf_enable()
>> > -        */
>> > -       memcpy(cpuc->assign, assign, n0*sizeof(int));
>> > -
>> > -       cpuc->n_events  = n0;
>> > -       cpuc->n_added  += n1;
>> > -       ctx->nr_active += n1;
>> > -
>> > -       /*
>> > -        * 1 means successful and events are active
>> > -        * This is not quite true because we defer
>> > -        * actual activation until hw_perf_enable() but
>> > -        * this way we* ensure caller won't try to enable
>> > -        * individual events
>> > -        */
>> > -       return 1;
>> > -undo:
>> > -       x86_event_sched_out(leader, cpuctx);
>> > -       n0  = 1;
>> > -       list_for_each_entry(sub, &leader->sibling_list, group_entry) {
>> > -               if (sub->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE) {
>> > -                       x86_event_sched_out(sub, cpuctx);
>> > -                       if (++n0 == n1)
>> > -                               break;
>> > -               }
>> > -       }
>> > -       return ret;
>> > -}
>> > -
>> >  #include "perf_event_amd.c"
>> >  #include "perf_event_p6.c"
>> >  #include "perf_event_p4.c"
>> > @@ -1454,6 +1345,47 @@ static inline void x86_pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
>> >        x86_perf_event_update(event);
>> >  }
>> >
>> > +/*
>> > + * Set the flag to make pmu::enable() not perform the
>> > + * schedulablilty test.
>> > + */
>> > +static void x86_pmu_start_txn(struct pmu *pmu)
>> > +{
>> > +       pmu->flag |= PERF_EVENT_TRAN_STARTED;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static void x86_pmu_stop_txn(struct pmu *pmu)
>> > +{
>> > +       pmu->flag &= ~PERF_EVENT_TRAN_STARTED;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +/*
>> > + * Return 0 if commit transaction success
>> > + */
>> > +static int x86_pmu_commit_txn(struct pmu *pmu)
>> > +{
>> > +       struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
>> > +       int assign[X86_PMC_IDX_MAX];
>> > +       int n, ret;
>> > +
>> > +       n = cpuc->n_events;
>> > +
>> > +       if (!x86_pmu_initialized())
>> > +               return -EAGAIN;
>> > +
>> > +       ret = x86_pmu.schedule_events(cpuc, n, assign);
>> > +       if (ret)
>> > +               return ret;
>> > +
>> > +       /*
>> > +        * copy new assignment, now we know it is possible
>> > +        * will be used by hw_perf_enable()
>> > +        */
>> > +       memcpy(cpuc->assign, assign, n*sizeof(int));
>> > +
>> > +       return 0;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> >  static const struct pmu pmu = {
>> >        .enable         = x86_pmu_enable,
>> >        .disable        = x86_pmu_disable,
>> > @@ -1461,6 +1393,9 @@ static const struct pmu pmu = {
>> >        .stop           = x86_pmu_stop,
>> >        .read           = x86_pmu_read,
>> >        .unthrottle     = x86_pmu_unthrottle,
>> > +       .start_txn      = x86_pmu_start_txn,
>> > +       .stop_txn       = x86_pmu_stop_txn,
>> > +       .commit_txn     = x86_pmu_commit_txn,
>> >  };
>> >
>> >  /*
>> > diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
>> > index bf896d0..93aa8d8 100644
>> > --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
>> > +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
>> > @@ -524,6 +524,8 @@ struct hw_perf_event {
>> >
>> >  struct perf_event;
>> >
>> > +#define PERF_EVENT_TRAN_STARTED 1
>> > +
>> >  /**
>> >  * struct pmu - generic performance monitoring unit
>> >  */
>> > @@ -534,6 +536,11 @@ struct pmu {
>> >        void (*stop)                    (struct perf_event *event);
>> >        void (*read)                    (struct perf_event *event);
>> >        void (*unthrottle)              (struct perf_event *event);
>> > +       void (*start_txn)               (struct pmu *pmu);
>> > +       void (*stop_txn)                (struct pmu *pmu);
>> > +       int (*commit_txn)               (struct pmu *pmu);
>> > +
>> > +       u8 flag;
>> >  };
>> >
>> >  /**
>> > @@ -799,9 +806,6 @@ extern void perf_disable(void);
>> >  extern void perf_enable(void);
>> >  extern int perf_event_task_disable(void);
>> >  extern int perf_event_task_enable(void);
>> > -extern int hw_perf_group_sched_in(struct perf_event *group_leader,
>> > -              struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> > -              struct perf_event_context *ctx);
>> >  extern void perf_event_update_userpage(struct perf_event *event);
>> >  extern int perf_event_release_kernel(struct perf_event *event);
>> >  extern struct perf_event *
>> > diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
>> > index 07b7a43..4537676 100644
>> > --- a/kernel/perf_event.c
>> > +++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
>> > @@ -83,14 +83,6 @@ extern __weak const struct pmu *hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
>> >  void __weak hw_perf_disable(void)              { barrier(); }
>> >  void __weak hw_perf_enable(void)               { barrier(); }
>> >
>> > -int __weak
>> > -hw_perf_group_sched_in(struct perf_event *group_leader,
>> > -              struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx,
>> > -              struct perf_event_context *ctx)
>> > -{
>> > -       return 0;
>> > -}
>> > -
>> >  void __weak perf_event_print_debug(void)       { }
>> >
>> >  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, perf_disable_count);
>> > @@ -642,14 +634,13 @@ group_sched_in(struct perf_event *group_event,
>> >               struct perf_event_context *ctx)
>> >  {
>> >        struct perf_event *event, *partial_group;
>> > +       struct pmu *pmu = (struct pmu *)group_event->pmu;
>> >        int ret;
>> >
>> >        if (group_event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF)
>> >                return 0;
>> >
>> > -       ret = hw_perf_group_sched_in(group_event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> > -       if (ret)
>> > -               return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
>> > +       pmu->start_txn(pmu);
>> >
>> >        if (event_sched_in(group_event, cpuctx, ctx))
>> >                return -EAGAIN;
>> > @@ -664,16 +655,21 @@ group_sched_in(struct perf_event *group_event,
>> >                }
>> >        }
>> >
>> > -       return 0;
>> > +       ret = pmu->commit_txn(pmu);
>> > +       if (!ret) {
>> > +               pmu->stop_txn(pmu);
>> > +               return 0;
>> > +       }
>> >
>> >  group_error:
>> > +       pmu->stop_txn(pmu);
>> > +
>> >        /*
>> > -        * Groups can be scheduled in as one unit only, so undo any
>> > -        * partial group before returning:
>> > +        * Commit transaction fails, rollback
>> > +        * Groups can be scheduled in as one unit only, so undo
>> > +        * whole group before returning:
>> >         */
>> >        list_for_each_entry(event, &group_event->sibling_list, group_entry) {
>> > -               if (event == partial_group)
>> > -                       break;
>> >                event_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> >        }
>> >        event_sched_out(group_event, cpuctx, ctx);
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-21  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-19 19:41 Corey Ashford
2010-01-20  0:44 ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-20  1:49   ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-20  9:35     ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-20 19:28       ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-20 13:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20 21:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20 23:23     ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-21  7:21       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-01-21 19:13         ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-21 19:28           ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-27 10:28             ` Ingo Molnar
2010-01-27 19:50               ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-28 10:57                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-28 18:00                   ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-28 19:06                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-28 19:44                       ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-28 22:08                       ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-29  9:52                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-29 23:05                           ` Corey Ashford
2010-01-30  8:42                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-01 19:39                               ` Corey Ashford
2010-02-01 19:54                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-21  8:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-21  8:47     ` stephane eranian
2010-01-21  8:59       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-21  9:16         ` stephane eranian
2010-01-21  9:43         ` stephane eranian
     [not found] ` <d3f22a1003290213x7d7904an59d50eb6a8616133@mail.gmail.com>
2010-03-30  7:42   ` Lin Ming
2010-03-30 16:49     ` Corey Ashford
2010-03-30 17:15       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-30 22:12         ` Corey Ashford
2010-03-31 14:01           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-31 14:13             ` stephane eranian
2010-03-31 15:49             ` Maynard Johnson
2010-03-31 17:50             ` Corey Ashford
2010-04-15 21:16         ` Gary.Mohr
2010-04-16 13:24           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-19  9:08             ` Lin Ming
2010-04-19  9:27               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-20 11:55             ` Lin Ming
2010-04-20 12:03               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-21  8:08                 ` Lin Ming
2010-04-21  8:32                   ` stephane eranian
2010-04-21  8:39                     ` Lin Ming
2010-04-21  8:44                       ` stephane eranian [this message]
2010-04-21  9:42                         ` Lin Ming
2010-04-21  9:57                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-21 22:12                             ` Lin Ming
2010-04-21 14:22                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-21 22:38                                 ` Lin Ming
2010-04-21 14:53                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-30 21:28       ` stephane eranian
2010-03-30 23:11         ` Corey Ashford
2010-03-31 13:43           ` stephane eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=i2j7c86c4471004210144kd8223bfbve5d6bee2820d0ccf@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=eranian@googlemail.com \
    --cc=Gary.Mohr@bull.com \
    --cc=cjashfor@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=eranian@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®