From: Sagi Maimon <maimon.sagi@gmail.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sagi Maimon <maimon.sagi@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/9] ptp: ocp: TAP CPLD follow-up fixes
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 17:28:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260922142829.57740-1-maimon.sagi@gmail.com> (raw)
Follow-up to the automated review of the TAP CPLD series, as Jakub asked
for on the v15 posting. Nothing here changes what the driver puts on the
I2C wire: the ISP command sequence, the frame contents and the arbitration
timing are untouched.
Patches 1-5 answer the review of 3/4. Patch 1 is the one with real
runtime behaviour to it: the CPLD identification read shared
ptp_ocp_sync_work() with the 1 Hz in-sync poller, and a claim that has to
wait for the MicroBlaze can occupy that work item for seconds, delaying
the dpll change notification and stalling the cancel_delayed_work_sync()
that ptp_ocp_remove() - also the .shutdown handler - starts with. Patch 2
is the point the review rated High: the hand-back can fail, and the driver
would then cache and publish whatever answered on the TMC segment as the
board serial and id.
Patches 6-9 answer the review of 4/4. Three of them remove ways the
driver could report success, or keep reporting an identity, when the part
had not done what was asked:
- a latched FAILED made every later flash of a part that had failed once
return -EIO at the enable step, before reaching the ERASE and REFRESH
that would recover it (patch 8);
- the post-REFRESH predicate was already satisfied by the state SET_DONE
leaves behind, so a REFRESH that was ACKed but never latched passed it
with the old image still running (patch 9);
- the cached identity was dropped after the erase *wait* rather than
before the erase was issued, and it dropped cpld.id too, which is the
silicon IDCODE and cannot change (patch 7).
Patch 6 stops publishing the string "unknown" as a devlink running
version. The review pointed out that devlink_info_version_put() invokes
its version_cb before the empty-value early-out, so an empty value still
registers the component name for devlink_flash_component_get() - which is
what a placeholder was needed for - while emitting no version attribute.
Tested on an ADVA TimeCard X1: the CPLD programs and activates as before
with the whole series applied, so the two checks that decide whether an
operation is believed - ENAB after EN_CFG_TP in patch 8, and ENAB clear
after REFRESH in patch 9 - agree with the part. Patches 2-4 sit on the
hand-back timeout and adapter-lookup failure paths, which do not trigger
in normal operation; the hand-back measures about 670 ms against its 2 s
budget.
v15: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260916153242.157171-1-sagi.maimon@adtran.com/T/#u
Sagi Maimon (9):
ptp: ocp: move the CPLD identification read off the sync worker
ptp: ocp: do not cache EEPROM content after a failed TMC bus hand-back
ptp: ocp: hand the TMC bus back once on an acquire timeout
ptp: ocp: forget a CPLD i2c adapter number that no longer resolves
ptp: ocp: correct the CPLD bookkeeping comments and the flash progress
ptp: ocp: report fw.cpld with an empty value until the USERCODE is
read
ptp: ocp: drop only the USERCODE when flashing, and drop it before
erasing
ptp: ocp: tolerate a latched FAILED when entering configuration mode
ptp: ocp: confirm the CPLD really left configuration mode after
REFRESH
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-timecard | 8 +-
Documentation/networking/devlink/ptp_ocp.rst | 28 ++-
drivers/ptp/ptp_ocp.c | 188 +++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
base-commit: 10cfa109c880092df32e396647b4afdca9be8350
--
2.47.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 14:28 Sagi Maimon [this message]
2026-09-22 14:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] ptp: ocp: move the CPLD identification read off the sync worker Sagi Maimon
2026-09-24 14:29 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 14:28 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] ptp: ocp: do not cache EEPROM content after a failed TMC bus hand-back Sagi Maimon
2026-09-24 14:29 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 14:28 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] ptp: ocp: hand the TMC bus back once on an acquire timeout Sagi Maimon
2026-09-24 14:29 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 14:28 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] ptp: ocp: forget a CPLD i2c adapter number that no longer resolves Sagi Maimon
2026-09-24 14:29 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 14:28 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] ptp: ocp: correct the CPLD bookkeeping comments and the flash progress Sagi Maimon
2026-09-24 14:29 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 14:28 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] ptp: ocp: report fw.cpld with an empty value until the USERCODE is read Sagi Maimon
2026-09-24 14:29 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 14:28 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] ptp: ocp: drop only the USERCODE when flashing, and drop it before erasing Sagi Maimon
2026-09-24 14:29 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 14:28 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] ptp: ocp: tolerate a latched FAILED when entering configuration mode Sagi Maimon
2026-09-24 14:29 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 14:28 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] ptp: ocp: confirm the CPLD really left configuration mode after REFRESH Sagi Maimon
2026-09-24 14:29 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260922142829.57740-1-maimon.sagi@gmail.com \
--to=maimon.sagi@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®