* [PATCH net] net: devmem: check uid and netns in net_devmem_get_binding()
@ 2026-10-05 21:04 Kaifeng Wang
2026-10-05 21:09 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kaifeng Wang @ 2026-10-05 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Cc: almasrymina, edumazet, pabeni, willemb, davem, kuba, horms, sdf,
bobbyeshleman, kaiyuanz, linux-kernel, Kaifeng Wang
NETDEV_CMD_BIND_TX is unprivileged, and dmabuf binding IDs are allocated
from a single global xarray. Currently net_devmem_get_binding() looks up
the binding by ID without checking whether the sending socket belongs to
the same user or network namespace that created the binding.
Record the creating netlink socket's network namespace and UID on the
binding, and verify both in net_devmem_get_binding() before checking the
route destination device. Return -EINVAL on mismatch so callers cannot
distinguish non-existent IDs from bindings owned by other users.
Fixes: bd61848900bf ("net: devmem: Implement TX path")
Signed-off-by: Kaifeng Wang <kaifengw@google.com>
---
net/core/devmem.c | 7 ++++++-
net/core/devmem.h | 5 +++++
net/core/netdev-genl.c | 5 +++--
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/devmem.c b/net/core/devmem.c
index f4d60654ce7f..9a773b1ce92d 100644
--- a/net/core/devmem.c
+++ b/net/core/devmem.c
@@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev, void *vdev,
enum dma_data_direction direction,
unsigned int dmabuf_fd, unsigned int niov_shift,
struct netdev_nl_sock *priv,
+ const struct sock *nl_sk,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding;
@@ -220,6 +221,8 @@ net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev, void *vdev,
binding->dev = dev;
binding->vdev = vdev;
+ write_pnet(&binding->net, sock_net(nl_sk));
+ binding->uid = sk_uid(nl_sk);
binding->niov_shift = niov_shift;
xa_init_flags(&binding->bound_rxqs, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
@@ -390,7 +393,9 @@ struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *net_devmem_get_binding(struct sock *sk,
int err = 0;
binding = net_devmem_lookup_dmabuf(dmabuf_id);
- if (!binding || !binding->tx_vec) {
+ if (!binding || !binding->tx_vec ||
+ !net_eq(sock_net(sk), read_pnet(&binding->net)) ||
+ !uid_eq(sk_uid(sk), binding->uid)) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto out_err;
}
diff --git a/net/core/devmem.h b/net/core/devmem.h
index 4a293a7d1149..7b9d3e04367c 100644
--- a/net/core/devmem.h
+++ b/net/core/devmem.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#ifndef _NET_DEVMEM_H
#define _NET_DEVMEM_H
+#include <net/net_namespace.h>
#include <net/netmem.h>
#include <net/netdev_netlink.h>
@@ -26,6 +27,8 @@ struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding {
* dereferenced.
*/
void *vdev;
+ possible_net_t net;
+ kuid_t uid;
struct gen_pool *chunk_pool;
/* Protect dev */
struct mutex lock;
@@ -97,6 +100,7 @@ net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev, void *vdev,
enum dma_data_direction direction,
unsigned int dmabuf_fd, unsigned int niov_shift,
struct netdev_nl_sock *priv,
+ const struct sock *nl_sk,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *net_devmem_lookup_dmabuf(u32 id);
void net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf(struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding);
@@ -181,6 +185,7 @@ net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev, void *vdev,
unsigned int dmabuf_fd,
unsigned int niov_shift,
struct netdev_nl_sock *priv,
+ const struct sock *nl_sk,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
diff --git a/net/core/netdev-genl.c b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
index 33b9f4eb9565..847814e3df3f 100644
--- a/net/core/netdev-genl.c
+++ b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
@@ -1094,7 +1094,7 @@ int netdev_nl_bind_rx_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
binding = net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(netdev, NULL, dma_dev, DMA_FROM_DEVICE,
dmabuf_fd, niov_shift, priv,
- info->extack);
+ NETLINK_CB(skb).sk, info->extack);
if (IS_ERR(binding)) {
err = PTR_ERR(binding);
goto err_rxq_bitmap;
@@ -1243,7 +1243,8 @@ int netdev_nl_bind_tx_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
binding = net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(bind_dev,
bind_dev != netdev ? netdev : NULL,
dma_dev, DMA_TO_DEVICE, dmabuf_fd,
- PAGE_SHIFT, priv, info->extack);
+ PAGE_SHIFT, priv, NETLINK_CB(skb).sk,
+ info->extack);
if (IS_ERR(binding)) {
err = PTR_ERR(binding);
goto err_unlock_bind_dev;
--
2.56.0.rc1.315.gc6ed9934b7-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net] net: devmem: check uid and netns in net_devmem_get_binding()
2026-10-05 21:04 [PATCH net] net: devmem: check uid and netns in net_devmem_get_binding() Kaifeng Wang
@ 2026-10-05 21:09 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-05 21:22 ` Kaifeng Wang
2026-10-05 22:24 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-06 16:19 ` Bobby Eshleman
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: netdev-bot+sinfo @ 2026-10-05 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kaifeng Wang
Cc: netdev, almasrymina, edumazet, pabeni, willemb, davem, kuba,
horms, sdf, bobbyeshleman, kaiyuanz, linux-kernel
Hi!
This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
commit messages seem to be missing some information:
- How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during
development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static
analysis tool scan.
- Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical
(e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include
the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages.
Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
then.
The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
that is the case please reply and explain.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] net: devmem: check uid and netns in net_devmem_get_binding()
2026-10-05 21:09 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
@ 2026-10-05 21:22 ` Kaifeng Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kaifeng Wang @ 2026-10-05 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev-bot+sinfo
Cc: netdev, almasrymina, edumazet, pabeni, willemb, davem, kuba,
horms, sdf, bobbyeshleman, kaiyuanz, linux-kernel
This issue was found by the Sashiko code review bot on the netdev
mailing list (Message-ID:
<179007458060.2160803.1077952399417880240@kernel.org>)
We verified it locally with a test that creates a TX dmabuf binding
via NETDEV_CMD_BIND_TX and sends packets from a socket owned by a
different UID or in a different network namespace. Without this patch,
the cross-UID and cross-netns sends succeed using the victim's dmabuf
binding ID; with this patch, net_devmem_get_binding() rejects them
with -EINVAL as expected.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] net: devmem: check uid and netns in net_devmem_get_binding()
2026-10-05 21:04 [PATCH net] net: devmem: check uid and netns in net_devmem_get_binding() Kaifeng Wang
2026-10-05 21:09 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
@ 2026-10-05 22:24 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-06 16:19 ` Bobby Eshleman
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stanislav Fomichev @ 2026-10-05 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kaifeng Wang
Cc: netdev, almasrymina, edumazet, pabeni, willemb, davem, kuba,
horms, sdf, bobbyeshleman, kaiyuanz, linux-kernel
On 10/05, Kaifeng Wang wrote:
> NETDEV_CMD_BIND_TX is unprivileged, and dmabuf binding IDs are allocated
> from a single global xarray. Currently net_devmem_get_binding() looks up
> the binding by ID without checking whether the sending socket belongs to
> the same user or network namespace that created the binding.
>
> Record the creating netlink socket's network namespace and UID on the
> binding, and verify both in net_devmem_get_binding() before checking the
> route destination device. Return -EINVAL on mismatch so callers cannot
> distinguish non-existent IDs from bindings owned by other users.
>
> Fixes: bd61848900bf ("net: devmem: Implement TX path")
> Signed-off-by: Kaifeng Wang <kaifengw@google.com>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH net] net: devmem: check uid and netns in net_devmem_get_binding()
2026-10-05 21:04 [PATCH net] net: devmem: check uid and netns in net_devmem_get_binding() Kaifeng Wang
2026-10-05 21:09 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-05 22:24 ` Stanislav Fomichev
@ 2026-10-06 16:19 ` Bobby Eshleman
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bobby Eshleman @ 2026-10-06 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kaifeng Wang
Cc: netdev, almasrymina, edumazet, pabeni, willemb, davem, kuba,
horms, sdf, bobbyeshleman, kaiyuanz, linux-kernel
On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 09:04:03PM +0000, Kaifeng Wang wrote:
> NETDEV_CMD_BIND_TX is unprivileged, and dmabuf binding IDs are allocated
> from a single global xarray. Currently net_devmem_get_binding() looks up
> the binding by ID without checking whether the sending socket belongs to
> the same user or network namespace that created the binding.
>
> Record the creating netlink socket's network namespace and UID on the
> binding, and verify both in net_devmem_get_binding() before checking the
> route destination device. Return -EINVAL on mismatch so callers cannot
> distinguish non-existent IDs from bindings owned by other users.
>
> Fixes: bd61848900bf ("net: devmem: Implement TX path")
> Signed-off-by: Kaifeng Wang <kaifengw@google.com>
> ---
> net/core/devmem.c | 7 ++++++-
> net/core/devmem.h | 5 +++++
> net/core/netdev-genl.c | 5 +++--
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/devmem.c b/net/core/devmem.c
> index f4d60654ce7f..9a773b1ce92d 100644
> --- a/net/core/devmem.c
> +++ b/net/core/devmem.c
> @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev, void *vdev,
> enum dma_data_direction direction,
> unsigned int dmabuf_fd, unsigned int niov_shift,
> struct netdev_nl_sock *priv,
> + const struct sock *nl_sk,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding;
> @@ -220,6 +221,8 @@ net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev, void *vdev,
>
> binding->dev = dev;
> binding->vdev = vdev;
> + write_pnet(&binding->net, sock_net(nl_sk));
> + binding->uid = sk_uid(nl_sk);
> binding->niov_shift = niov_shift;
> xa_init_flags(&binding->bound_rxqs, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
>
> @@ -390,7 +393,9 @@ struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *net_devmem_get_binding(struct sock *sk,
> int err = 0;
>
> binding = net_devmem_lookup_dmabuf(dmabuf_id);
> - if (!binding || !binding->tx_vec) {
> + if (!binding || !binding->tx_vec ||
> + !net_eq(sock_net(sk), read_pnet(&binding->net)) ||
> + !uid_eq(sk_uid(sk), binding->uid)) {
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto out_err;
> }
> diff --git a/net/core/devmem.h b/net/core/devmem.h
> index 4a293a7d1149..7b9d3e04367c 100644
> --- a/net/core/devmem.h
> +++ b/net/core/devmem.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #ifndef _NET_DEVMEM_H
> #define _NET_DEVMEM_H
>
> +#include <net/net_namespace.h>
> #include <net/netmem.h>
> #include <net/netdev_netlink.h>
>
> @@ -26,6 +27,8 @@ struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding {
> * dereferenced.
> */
> void *vdev;
> + possible_net_t net;
> + kuid_t uid;
> struct gen_pool *chunk_pool;
> /* Protect dev */
> struct mutex lock;
> @@ -97,6 +100,7 @@ net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev, void *vdev,
> enum dma_data_direction direction,
> unsigned int dmabuf_fd, unsigned int niov_shift,
> struct netdev_nl_sock *priv,
> + const struct sock *nl_sk,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *net_devmem_lookup_dmabuf(u32 id);
> void net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf(struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding);
> @@ -181,6 +185,7 @@ net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev, void *vdev,
> unsigned int dmabuf_fd,
> unsigned int niov_shift,
> struct netdev_nl_sock *priv,
> + const struct sock *nl_sk,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> diff --git a/net/core/netdev-genl.c b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
> index 33b9f4eb9565..847814e3df3f 100644
> --- a/net/core/netdev-genl.c
> +++ b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
> @@ -1094,7 +1094,7 @@ int netdev_nl_bind_rx_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
>
> binding = net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(netdev, NULL, dma_dev, DMA_FROM_DEVICE,
> dmabuf_fd, niov_shift, priv,
> - info->extack);
> + NETLINK_CB(skb).sk, info->extack);
> if (IS_ERR(binding)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(binding);
> goto err_rxq_bitmap;
> @@ -1243,7 +1243,8 @@ int netdev_nl_bind_tx_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> binding = net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(bind_dev,
> bind_dev != netdev ? netdev : NULL,
> dma_dev, DMA_TO_DEVICE, dmabuf_fd,
> - PAGE_SHIFT, priv, info->extack);
> + PAGE_SHIFT, priv, NETLINK_CB(skb).sk,
> + info->extack);
> if (IS_ERR(binding)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(binding);
> goto err_unlock_bind_dev;
> --
> 2.56.0.rc1.315.gc6ed9934b7-goog
>
Reviewed-by: Bobby Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-06 16:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-05 21:04 [PATCH net] net: devmem: check uid and netns in net_devmem_get_binding() Kaifeng Wang
2026-10-05 21:09 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-05 21:22 ` Kaifeng Wang
2026-10-05 22:24 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-10-06 16:19 ` Bobby Eshleman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®