From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
To: Tobias Schumacher <ts@linux.ibm.com>,
Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
Julian Ruess <julianr@linux.ibm.com>,
Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] s390/pci: Fix use-after-free race in zpci floating interrupt cleanup
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 21:23:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff4e4c7cbd39dd457892589a5f75e9be0bcc060f.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261005-s390_irq_domain_fixes-v2-4-d45b824874c0@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2026-10-05 at 14:03 +0200, Tobias Schumacher wrote:
> zpci_clear_irq() stops the adapter from raising new interrupts for the
> function, but a zpci_floating_irq_handler() already running on another CPU
> can still be scanning zdev->aibv when zpci_msi_teardown_floating() releases
> it.
>
> Clear the zpci_ibv[] entry so no further handler picks the vector up, then
> wait for a grace period before releasing it. The handler runs inside the
> rcu_read_lock() section that do_airq_interrupt() holds across
> airq->handler(), so synchronize_rcu() drains any handler still in flight.
> Free the summary bit only after the grace period, so it cannot be handed to
> another device while a reader still holds the old pointer.
>
> zpci_ibv served both delivery modes, indexed by summary bit under
> FLOATING and by cpu under DIRECTED. Only the floating vectors are
> published to and torn down under the interrupt handler, so split the
> directed vectors out into zpci_dibv and annotate zpci_ibv __rcu, which
> lets sparse check the accessors above.
>
> Fixes: f770950a4709 ("s390/pci: Migrate s390 IRQ logic to IRQ domain API")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Schumacher <ts@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/pci/pci_irq.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
--- snip ---
> @@ -660,10 +664,12 @@ void __init zpci_irq_exit(void)
>
> if (irq_delivery == DIRECTED) {
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - airq_iv_release(zpci_ibv[cpu]);
> + airq_iv_release(zpci_dibv[cpu]);
> }
> + kfree(zpci_dibv);
> + } else {
> + kfree(zpci_ibv);
> }
> - kfree(zpci_ibv);
> if (zpci_sbv)
> airq_iv_release(zpci_sbv);
> unregister_adapter_interrupt(&zpci_airq);
This is pre-existing but my additional LLM review noticed it. It
seems like a theoretical race and against the reverse cleanup vs setup
rule, that kfree(zpci_ibv) is done before
unregister_adapter_interrupt().
Thanks,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-06 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-05 12:03 [PATCH v2 0/7] s390/pci: Fix bugs in IRQ domain migration and resource cleanup Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-05 12:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] s390/pci: Fix double-free and NULL deref in zpci MSI domain cleanup Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-06 9:42 ` Niklas Schnelle
2026-10-05 12:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] s390/pci: Fix resource leak in zpci MSI setup Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-06 9:55 ` Niklas Schnelle
2026-10-05 12:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] s390/pci: Fix MSI directed-mode teardown IRQ bit count Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-06 11:10 ` Niklas Schnelle
2026-10-05 12:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] s390/pci: Fix use-after-free race in zpci floating interrupt cleanup Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-06 15:18 ` Niklas Schnelle
2026-10-07 5:50 ` Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-06 19:23 ` Niklas Schnelle [this message]
2026-10-07 6:02 ` Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-05 12:03 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] s390/pci: Add error cleanup in zpci_directed_irq_init Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-06 13:32 ` Niklas Schnelle
2026-10-07 6:04 ` Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-06 19:19 ` Niklas Schnelle
2026-10-07 6:10 ` Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-05 12:03 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] s390/pci: Set MSI_FLAG_NO_AFFINITY at IRQ init time Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-06 15:33 ` Niklas Schnelle
2026-10-05 12:03 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] s390/pci: Drop the unused index argument of zpci_msi_clear_airq() Tobias Schumacher
2026-10-06 15:28 ` Niklas Schnelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff4e4c7cbd39dd457892589a5f75e9be0bcc060f.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=julianr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ts@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®